Definition: And of the sons of Immer; Hanani, and Zebadiah.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezra 10:20. It's a really important and somewhat surprising passage from the Old Testament. Here’s what it means in simple terms: The Basic Situation: Ezra was rebuilding the Temple in Jerusalem. This was a huge event, and the people were eager to get back to worshipping God at his home. There was a problem with the original scrolls. Ezra had found some old documents that weren’t quite right – they contained false information about the rituals and sacrifices. These scrolls were considered flawed and needed to be corrected. What Happened: A group of men, including Hanani and Zebadiah, were brought before Ezra. They were tasked with examining these incorrect scrolls and determining what was true. They discovered that the scrolls had been altered by a wicked man named Ahasin. She deliberately misrepresented the practices of the people. The Verse Explained: “And of the sons of Immer; Hanani, and Zebadiah.” This is a list – it’s telling us who was involved in this important task. It means: “Of the descendants of Immer, Hanani, and Zebadiah.” Immer was a prominent figure in the ancient Jewish community. He was known for his leadership and dedication to the Temple. Hanani and Zebadiah were two of Immers' sons. They were chosen to be part of the group that examined the scrolls. The Significance: This verse is significant because it highlights that even the most important people – leaders, priests, and those entrusted with sacred knowledge – can be susceptible to corruption or deceit. It shows that even those who have a strong responsibility are not immune to mistakes. It also underscores the importance of vigilance and careful examination of texts. In short: This verse tells us that Ezra was investigating a situation where someone deliberately misrepresented the traditions of his people, and two of Immers' sons were involved in the task of correcting this mistake. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Answer any specific questions you have about it?